
第二章 话语研究的方法与视角
Chapter 2 Methods and Perspectives of Discourse Studies
钱毓芳 叶蒙荻 著
丛书:中华话语系列丛书 第3卷
语言:中文
出版年代:2019年
出版社:环球世纪出版 (伦敦)
页数:281
尺寸:170 x 244 mm
ISBN 978-1-910334-72-0 精装: £69.99
ISBN 978-1-910334-73-7 平装: £36.99
E-book (电子版):£22.99
DOI https://doi.org/10.24103/CD3.cn.2019
By QIAN Yufang and YE Mengdi
Language: Chinese
Year of publicationg: 2019
Publisher: Global Century Press (London)
Page: 281
Size: 170 x 244 mm
ISBN 978-1-910334-72-0 (Chinese hardback) £69.99
ISBN 978-1-910334-73-7 (Chinese paperback) £36.99
DOI https://doi.org/10.24103/CD3.cn.2019 E-book £22.99
£15.00
本章讨论了话语与话语分析的定义,并对批判性与非批评性的 话语研究方法进行了文献综述。对媒体语言的研究以及低碳经济研究的前期成果进行回顾,近年来从话语视角的方法越来越受到学界的重视,相关的研究成果丰硕。以话语为纽带可以整合人文社科的各学科,这种趋势越来越明显。以上的研究在大规模文本的处理上大多用人工阅读的方法,很少使用语料库技术。
20 世纪80年代计算机技术的迅速发展成就了 语料库语言学,开辟了语言研究的新天地,正如Leech(1992)指出, 语料库技术就像“芝麻开门”一样开启人们对语言研究的新思路。在过去的半个世纪,特别是近20 多年来语料库语言学取得了丰硕的成果, 语料库及语料库分析软件被大量运用于语言研究的方方面面,被当作语言研究默认的工具(Teubert,2005)。近年来西方尤其是英国许多学者开始将语料库方法和批判话语研究有机结合起来运用到媒体话语研究中,相关方法见第三章。
第二节 媒体话语研究方法
媒体话语研究方法林林总总,本书将他们分为批判性方法与非批判性方法。批判话语分析将话语作为更广泛的含义加以研究。从这个意义上话语不仅仅是一组句子,一篇文本或者是一组文本,它同时还是一种实践:是在一组文本或者是更大范围内的社区所使用语言的特征所在。话语不仅是人们谈论某事的方式,而且还是人们的思维方式。通过分析语言,批判话语分析家旨在揭示一个群体怎样将自己、社会环境、他者、以及和他们相关的问题概念化。因此,批判话语分析具有完完全全的社会政治属性,具有一个鲜明的政治立场(通常是左翼倾向),从不间断地关照社会中的权力关系,尤其是那些弱势的群体(McEnery & Hardie, 2012)。非批判性方法则包括 社会语言学方法、 会话分析法、 结构方法、 系统功能方法、 语用方法、 认知法等。
一、批判性方法
(一)批判语言学
“批判”这个概念的基本含义是指当人们做研究时重点放在自身的反思,与研究对象之间保持一定的距离,将它们嵌入到社会中,并使它们潜在的立场清晰化(Wodak,2001:9)。批判语言学(又名批评语言学)基于Halliday 系统功能语言学理论,由东安格利亚大学Fowler为代表的一批学者在20世纪70年代发展而来。 媒体话语是其主要的关注点之一。Fowler(1991:4)认为“语言并非中性而是具有高度建设性的媒介”。新闻用语言来反映这个世界,因为语言是一个符号系统,这个符号系统构建了价值观、社会和经济本质的结构。批判语言学的框架强调文本的多种功能性质。结合Halliday语言的意念功能、交际功能和篇章功能理念,Fairclough(1995:17-25)指出“代表性、关系和身份等因素总是共现于每个语篇”,它通过词汇、语法等的选择呈现出来。
……
第四节 低碳话语的研究
本研究考察了web of science 和国内的中文期刊网关于低碳经济国内外的相关研究,发现近20年来曾上升趋势,这些研究主要从经济学、政治学、国际关系学等学科的视角居多,学界纷纷从探讨新的经济模式、实现途径、立法等论题进行研究,而从话语的视角切入的研究凤毛麟角。
一、国内研究
近年来,中外有关“低碳经济”的著述可谓汗牛充栋。比如单就文章而言,在中国知网上以“低碳经济”为 主题词搜索,截至2014年12月30 日,共10208篇,从数量上看,基本以2009年为界,从文献最早出现的2005年到2009年只有264篇,不到整个文献的3%。之后则呈井喷式增长,尽管并非全为研究型文章,但数量也颇为可观,具体情况如下图所示:
图2.1 中国期刊网关于低碳经济的研究文章分布
……
Download PDF – 做一个butten,点击即可下载
Get acess – 做一个butten,点击进入Register 或者login
目 录
总序言一 / 谢立中
总序言二 / 钱毓芳
序言
第一章 绪论
第一节 研究的缘起
第二节 中英美三国主流报刊简介
第三节 分析框架
第四节 本书结构
第二章 话语研究的方法与视角
第一节 关于话语的定义
第二节 媒体话语研究方法
第三节 中国的话语研究
第四节 低碳话语的研究
第五节 本章小结
第三章 语料库方法论
第一节 语料库概述
第二节 语料库方法
第三节 语料库与话语研究
第四节 语料库的创建
第五节 语料库分析
第六节 本章小结
第四章 《人民日报》围绕低碳的话语建构
第一节 语料分布趋势
第二节 主题词分析
第三节 “低碳经济”趋同化分析
第四节 “低碳经济”的检索行分析
第五节 讨论
第六节 本章小结
第五章 英国主流报刊围绕低碳的话语建构
第一节 语料分布趋势
第二节 词频分析
第三节 Low carbon搭配网络分析
第四节 Low carbon检索行分析
第五节 讨论
第六节 本章小结
第六章 美国主流报刊围绕低碳的话语建构
第一节 语料分布趋势
第二节 主题词分析
第三节 Low carbon的搭配网络分析
第四节 Low carbon的检索行分析
第五节 讨论
第六节 本章小结
第七章 中国、英国、美国社会情境分析
第一节 政治制度
第二节 新闻的生产
第三节 低碳话语与社会情境
第四节 本章小结
第八章 结论
第一节 研究发现
第二节 研究评价
第三节 未来展望
第四节 本章小结
参考文献
附录
一、2000—2014年中英美主流报刊关于“低碳”报道的数量分布表
二、三个阶段《人民日报》低碳经济的共现词
三、《人民日报》“低碳经济”检索行
四、英国主流报刊“low carbon economy”检索行
五、美国主流报刊“low carbon economy”检索行
六、温家宝在哥本哈根气候变化会议领导人会议上的讲话
环球世纪出版社双语信息
(一)关于本书
(一)作者
(二)英文目录(见第vi页)
(三)本系列丛书及其它书籍
Table of contents
Prefaces
General Preface One / XIE Lizhong xi
General Preface Two / QIAN Yufang xiv
Preface xiv
Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1 The Origin of Research
1.2 Introduction to the Main-stream Newspapers in China, UK and US
1.3 Analytical Framework
1.4 The Structure of the Book
Chapter 2
Methods and Perspectives of Discourse Studies
2.1 The Definition of Discourse
2.2 Methods for Media Discourse
2.3 Discourse Studies in China
2.4 Studies on Low-carbon Discourse
2.5 Summary
Chapter 3
Corpus methodology
3.1 Introduction to Corpus Linguistics
3.2 Corpus Approaches
3.3 Corpora and Discourse studies
3.4 Corpus Building
3.5 Corpus Analysis
3.6 Summary
Chapter 4
Discursive Constructions around Low-carbon in the People’s Daily
4.1 Tendency of Reports Mentioned Low-carbon
4.2 Keywords Analysis
4.3 Convergence Analysis of Low-carbon Economy
4.4 Concordance Analysis of Low-carbon Economy
4.5 Discussion
4.6 Summary
Chapter 5
Discursive Constructions around Low-carbon in British Mainstream Newspapers
5.1 Tendency of Reports Mentioned Low-carbon
5.2 Frequency Analysis
5.3 Collocational Network Analysis of Low-carbon
5.4 Concordance Analysis of Low-carbon
5.5 Discussion
5.6 Summary
Chapter 6
Discursive Constructions around Low-carbon in American Mainstream Newspapers
6.1 Tendency of Reports Mentioned Low-carbon
6.2 Keywords Analysis
6.3 Collocational Network Analysis of Low-carbon
6.4 Concordance Analysis of Low-carbon
6.5 Discussion
6.6 Summary
Chapter 7
Social Context Analysis of China, UK and US
7.1 Political System
7.2 News Production
7.3 Low-carbon Discourses and Social Context
7.4 Summary
Chapter 8
Conclusion
8.1 Research Findings
8.2 Research Evaluation
8.3 Future Prospects
8.4 Summary
References
Appendices
1 Table of the Low-carbon Reports from 2000 to 2014
2 Co-occurrences of Low-carbon Economy in the People’s Daily
3 Concordances of Low-carbon in the People’s Daily
4 Concordances of Low-carbon in British Newspapers
5 Concordances of Low-carbon in American Newspapers
6 Wen Jiabao’s Speech on Copenhagen Climate Change Summit
Dual language information from Global Century Press
1 About the book
2 About the author
3 Table of contents
4 About the book series and other books in this series
法国后现代主义思想家米歇尔·福柯的话语权力理论揭示了“话语”作为一种社会实践所具有的建构功能和权力特征,语言作为反映社会现实的载体与权力﹑社会﹑意识形态联系了起来。这一建构性的话语理论使人文﹑社会科学许多学科受到启发,加以研究。自上世纪80年代后期,媒体话语作为使用中的语言以及其特殊的篇章结构和社会文化实践受到语言学家关注。一些分析方法应运而生,批判话语研究便是其中之一,起源于上世纪80年代,随着大量研究的展开,人们发现只凭单个语篇进行分析远远不能回答研究问题,且分析会带入个人偏见,为了使研究更全面可靠,人们开始使用语料库的方法来考察大规模的文本,两者各有其优势,互相取长补短。近10年来基于语料库的批判话语研究越来越多地被中国社会科学学者所采用,本书聚焦中英美三国主流报刊2000年以来关于低碳的报道,分析围绕低碳的话语建构,较系统地将语料库和批判话语分析的方法用于媒体话语分析中,将定性和定量研究有效结合起来。语料库提供的语言例证是凭直觉的研究方法所不能及,批判话语研究分析的方法又使语料库所提供的例证变得清晰明了。我们从词频信息中发现许多有趣的有待进一步考察的现象;研究表明词丛﹑搭配词分析伴随着语料库检索来考察其上下文中的分析为定量的分析增添了定性的成份,使结果更可靠﹑更全面。将语料库的发现和社会情境相结合使我们更清晰地认识到话语是意识形态的反映。本研究抛砖引玉,希冀更多的学者将此方法用于社会科学领域与语言相关的研究中。
The discourse power theory of Michel Foucault, a French postmodernist thinker, reveals the constructive function and power characteristics of “discourse” as a social practice. Language, as a carrier reflecting social reality, is associated with power, society and ideology. This constructive discourse theory enlightens and studies many disciplines of Humanities and social sciences. Since the late 1980s, media discourse has attracted linguists’ attention as a language in use, as well as its special textual structure and social and cultural practice. Some analytical methods have emerged at the historic moment, and critical discourse research is one of them. It originated in the 1980s. With the development of a large number of studies, people find that it is far from possible to answer research questions only by analyzing a single text, and that analysis will bring personal prejudice. In order to make the research more comprehensive and reliable, people begin to use corpus. The method of studying large-scale texts has its own advantages and draws on each other’s strengths to complement each other’s weaknesses. In the past 10 years, corpus-based critical discourse research has been increasingly adopted by Chinese social scientists. This book focuses on the reports on low-carbon in the mainstream newspapers and periodicals of China, Britain and the United States since 2000. It analyses discourse construction around low-carbon, and systematically applies corpus and critical discourse analysis to media discourse analysis. Combine qualitative and quantitative research effectively. The linguistic examples provided by corpus are beyond the intuitive research method, and the critical discourse analysis method makes the examples provided by corpus clear. We find many interesting phenomena that need to be further investigated from word frequency information. Studies show that the analysis of word clusters and collocations, accompanied by corpus retrieval, adds qualitative elements to quantitative analysis and makes the results more reliable and comprehensive. The combination of corpus findings and social context makes us realize more clearly that discourse is the reflection of ideology. This study is expected to attract more scholars to apply this method to language-related research in the field of social sciences.
钱毓芳,浙江工商大学中外话语研究院教授、院长,曾为浙江传媒学院话语与传播研究中心创始主任。研究兴趣包括语料库语言学与话语研究。兼任中国英汉语比较研究会话语研究专业委员会副会长、语料库翻译学专业委员会常务理事以及语料库语言学专业委员会理事。专著Discursive Constructions around Terrorism in the ‘People’s Daily’ and ‘The Sun’ before and after 9.11 获第六届教育部高校优秀科研成果三等奖。合著出版《批判话语分析新发展研究》一书。发表了20余篇与语料库与话语研究相关的论文。主编Corpus Approaches to Chinese Social Science (英文版,2018)。是英国环球世纪出版社“中华话语”系列丛书共同主编(中英文版),以及《语料库与中国社会科学》期刊(中文版,2018)主编。
叶蒙荻,浙江传媒学院马克思主义学院教授,1985年获浙江师范大学哲学学士学位,2006年获武汉大学教育管理硕士学位。研究兴趣包括媒体融合﹑新媒体传播﹑网络管理等,近年来发表论文20余篇媒介素养﹑网络空间利用等相关论文;参与多项国家社科基金项目以及教育部项目。
QIAN Yufang is a Professor and Director of Institute of Chinese and Foreign Discourses, Zhejiang Gongshang University, China. She was the Founding Director of the Research Centre for Discourse and Communications, Zhejiang University of Media & Communications (the fi rst such in China) Former Founding Director of She is also the Vice President of the Discourse Research Association of China, an Executive Director of the Corpus Translation Society of China, and a Director of the Chinese Corpus Linguistic Society. She has published more than two dozens of journal articles on corpus based discourse studies. She is author of Discursive Constructions Around Terrorism in the People’s Daily and The Sun Before and After 9.11 (Oxford: Peter Lang, 2010), won a prize of the Excellent Scientific Research Achievements of Humanities and Social Sciences by the Ministry of Education. She is Editor of Corpus-based discourse on Climate Change and Corpus Approaches to Chinese Social Science (2018), co-editor of the Chinese Discourse book series (in English and Chinese since 2016), joint Editor of the Global China Dialogue Proceedings Vol. 3 in both English and Chinese (2017), and Editor of Journal of Corpus Approaches to Chinese Social Sciences (in Chinese, 2018).
YE Mengdi, Professor of School of Marxist Studies, Communication University of Zhejiang, received a Bachelor of Philosophy degree from Zhejiang Normal University in 1985 and a Master of Education Management degree from Wuhan University in 2006. Research interests include media convergence, new media communication, network management, etc. In recent years, more than 20 papers have been published on media literacy, cyberspace utilization and other related papers, and participated in a number of national social science fund projects and Ministry of Education projects.
随着世界转向低碳经济,了解不同的文化如何看待这一变化至关重要。在本书中,作者采用语料库语言学的方法,结合话语分析,对比了中国、英国和美国这三种语境下与低碳经济有关的新闻媒体话语。每一案例 研究的发现都语境化至其所处的社会和政治环境中进行阐释。总体而言,从2000年到2014年的15年间,这项非常受欢迎的研究提供了对同一问题的不同、有时甚至是有争议的观点的洞察和理解。——托尼·麦克尼:兰卡斯特大学英语与语言学杰出教授,英国社会科学院院士,语料库社科法创始人
本书以语料库与批评话语分析相结合的角度,为媒体对低碳问题的报道研究,提供了一种新颖独到的方法。它有助于读者感受中国、美国及英国三个国家中,语言使用对传媒塑造低碳话题的潜移默化的作用。书中对 大众媒介语言应用变迁的细微观察,及语境阐释的背景分析,为应用语言 学实证研究提供的一个很好的范例。对希望以语料库为辅助分析工具的社 会科学及人文研究者而言,是一本值得一读的专著。——曹青博士,杜伦大学现代语言与文化学院副教授
As the world moves to a low-carbon economy it is important to understand different cultural perspectives on this change. In this book the authors use insights from corpus linguistics, coupled with discourse analysis, to contrast news media discourse relating to the low-carbon economy in three contexts, China, the UK and the US. In each case the findings are contextualised to the social and political context in which they occur. Overall this very welcome study provides insight and understanding into different, and at times contested, views of the same problem over 15 years from 2000 to 2014. — Tony McEnery FAcSS, Distinguished Professor of English Language and Linguistics at Lancaster University, Funding Director of the ESRC Centre for Corpus Approaches to Social Science (CASS), UK
This book provides an innovative approach to the study of low-carbon issues in the press from the perspective of corpus-based critical discourse analysis. It helps the reader appreciate the pungent role of language use in shaping the way low-car don subject is dealt with in three case study countries: China, the US and the UK. It is a good example of applied linguistics – empirical analysis of changing language in the real world and contextual explications. Those interested in how social science research can benefit from corpus-aided analysis should find this book a
worthwhile read. — Dr Qing Cao, Associate Professor in the School of Modern Languages and Cultures, Durham University, UK
本书是《中华话语》丛书的第三本。该丛书由北京大学社会理论研究中心主任、中国社会学学会前副会长谢立中教授和浙江工商大学中外话语研究所所长、中国英汉语比较研究会话语研究专业委员会副会长钱毓芳教授共同主编,由环球世纪出版社于2016年开始出版。
在20世纪下半叶,西方哲学和社会科学的一个重要成就是认识到“话语”在理解人们的日常生活和构建社会现实的过程中的关键作用,并将话语的研究和分析置于哲学和社会科学研究的核心。话语分析在1980年代引入中国,并且自那时起在中国不断发展。
在过去的三十年中,特别是在最后十年中,许多中国学者试图使用话语分析的框架来描述和分析在当代中国社会中各种“话语”的生产和传播,以及“话语”在构建社会现实中的作用。结果,许多研究在语言学、传播、哲学、社会学、政治、经济、法律、心理学、教育、国际关系和文学批评等领域发表,其中许多都是开创性和创新性的。虽然中国学者的成就在数量和质量上仍与西方学者存在差距,但这些研究在从话语构建的角度理解当代中国方面发挥了不可替代的作用。
基于语料库的批判性话语分析方法始于1990年代。其拥护者将语料库方法与批判性话语分析相结合,有效地消除了定量研究和定性研究之间的隔阂,并为话语研究提供了更坚实的定量分析基础。从那时起,学者们一直在探索更多补充语料库和批判性话语分析的方法。Paul Baker的书《使用语料库进行话语分析》(2006年)概述了许多基于语料库的话语分析技术,这标志着这种方法向成熟迈出了重要的一步。
本系列涵盖了围绕中国历史、文化、时事、语言和人民的话语研究。此外,它倡导一种跨学科、多角度、多方法的知识,这种知识融合了中国文化并具有全球视野,弥合了中国与世界其他地方的差距,为外界理解中国打开了一扇窗户。有关更多细节,请参阅本系列的两篇总序。
The series has been published by Global Century Press from 2016. It is edited jointly by Professor XIE Lizhong, Director of the Centre for Social Theory Studies, Peking University; formerly Vice-President of the Chinese Sociological Association, China, and Professor QIAN Yufang, Director of Institute of Chinese and Foreign Discourses, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Vice-President of the Discourse Research Association of China.
In the second half of the 20th century an important achievement of Western philosophy and social sciences was to appreciate the key role of ‘discourse’ in the process of understanding people’s daily life and constructing social reality, and to put the study and analysis of discourse at the core of research on philosophy and social sciences. Discourse analysis was introduced into China in the 1980s, and has been continuously developing there ever since.
During the past thirty years, and particularly in the last decade, a number of Chinese scholars have attempted to employ the framework of discourse analysis to describe and analyse both the production and communication of various ‘discourses’ in contemporary Chinese society, and how ‘discourse’ functions in constructing social reality. As a result, numerous studies have been published in the fi elds of linguistics, communications, philosophy, sociology, politics, economics, law, psychology, education, international relations and literary criticism, many of which are pioneering and innovative. Although there is still a gap between the achievements of Chinese scholars and those of their Western counterparts in quantity and quality, these studies play an irreplaceable role in understanding contemporary China from the perspective of discourse construction.
Corpus-based approaches to critical discourse analysis started in the 1990s. Its proponents combined corpus approaches with CDA, effectively eliminating the separation between quantitative and qualitative studies and providing a stronger basis for quantitative analysis within discourse studies. Since then, scholars have been exploring more ways of complementing corpus and critical discourse analysis. Paul Baker’s book Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis (2006) provides an overview of many corpus-based techniques in discourse analysis, which marks an important step towards maturity for this approach.
This series covers discourse studies around Chinese history, culture, current affairs, language and people. Moreover, it advocates an interdisciplinary, multi-perspective, multi-method knowledge merged with Chinese culture and possessing a global outlook, which bridges the gap between China and the rest of the world and opens a window for the outside world to understand China. For more details see the two General Prefaces of this series.
Please note:
Please add this product to your shopping card and download the PDF after check out.
Please note:
Currently, access to content through a university, library, or employer subscription is not available.
However, you can easily register an account to purchase and download it.
Register 做一个butten 链接注册表; Login – 也做一个butten 链接到登录页面(供已经注册过的读者进来)
钱毓芳 叶蒙荻, 《语料库与媒体话语的 理论、方法与实践 —— 中英美主流报刊中的低碳话语研究》第二章 话语研究的方法与视角,伦敦:环球世纪出版社,2019年。DOI https://doi.org/10.24103/CD3.cn.2019??? (QIAN Yufang and YE Mengdi, 2019, Chapter 2 Methods and Perspectives of Discourse Studies, Theory, Method and Practice in Media Discourse: A Corpus-based Study of Low-Carbon in Chinese, UK and US Media (in Chinese), London: Global Century Press. DOI https://doi.org/10.24103/CD3.cn.2019???)
Copy citation 做一个butten 安插一个小插件
Share the book 1)或者做一个butten,安插一个小插件,点击即可复制URL 见: https://journalofchinesesociology.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40711-023-00192-7#citeas
2)或者 把email,facebook,Twitter,Linkedin 等 icons和文字 放在这里供读者点击分享, 见: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1440783319846188 在这里有一个Share,点击可见
这是关于此书的,以后每个章节和每篇文章都按此模式
This page is under development.
钱毓芳 叶蒙荻, 《语料库与媒体话语的 理论、方法与实践 —— 中英美主流报刊中的低碳话语研究》第二章 话语研究的方法与视角,伦敦:环球世纪出版社,2019年。DOI https://doi.org/10.24103/CD3.cn.2019??? (QIAN Yufang and YE Mengdi, 2019, Chapter 2 Methods and Perspectives of Discourse Studies, Theory, Method and Practice in Media Discourse: A Corpus-based Study of Low-Carbon in Chinese, UK and US Media (in Chinese), London: Global Century Press. DOI https://doi.org/10.24103/CD3.cn.2019???)
以前期刊在这里是一个插件,点击 RightsLink 这个按钮即可,后来他们发展了,RightsLink https://www.copyright.com/ 怎么办?
Related products
Useful Information
Support us
Click the button below to donate to
Global China Academy (UK Charity No. 1198983)