《全球中国比较研究》

本文通过对纳维尔的《礼仪与敬意：在比较的语境中延伸中国哲学》和钟鸣旦的《礼仪的交织：明末清初中欧文化交流中的丧葬礼》两部著作的书评，探讨哲学概念和宗教文本的翻译问题。文章分析了儒学核心概念“仁”的翻译挑战，指出其在不同文化语境中的语义差异，并提出音译、脚注和释义作为翻译策略。随后，文章讨论了术语翻译在哲学文本中的重要性，强调术语的学科属性对译文准确性的影响，并通过实例比较不同翻译策略的适用性。此外，文章介绍了自译作为翻译研究中的特殊领域，分析其在翻译策略上的灵活性和局限性，以及自译对翻译理论和实践的影响。通过这些探讨，文章进一步反思翻译哲学**的建构，强调翻译不仅是语言转换的过程，更是文化与思想交流的重要途径，值得深入研究和探讨。

This article explores issues in the translation of philosophical concepts and religious texts through a review of two works: Ritual and Respect: Extending Chinese Philosophy in a Comparative Context by Roger T. Ames, and Interweaving Rituals: Funerary Rites in Sino-European Cultural Exchanges in the Late Ming and Early Qing by Nicolas Standaert. The paper analyzes the challenges of translating core Confucian concepts, particularly ren (仁), and highlights the semantic shifts that occur across cultural contexts. It proposes transliteration, footnotes, and explanatory translation as potential strategies. The article further discusses the importance of terminology translation in philosophical texts, emphasizing how the disciplinary nature of terms affects the accuracy of the translation. Through comparative case studies, it evaluates the applicability of various translation strategies. In addition, the paper introduces self-translation as a unique field in translation studies, analyzing both its flexibility and limitations, as well as its implications for translation theory and practice. Through these discussions, the article reflects on the construction of a philosophy of translation, emphasizing that translation is not merely a linguistic transfer, but a crucial channel for cultural and intellectual exchange—one that deserves deeper study and critical engagement.